Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Author: vduk

August undefined, 2024

WebEF 100-400 II vs. RF 100-500. I recently picked up an R6 Mark ii and I’ve been trying to decide which lens to buy out of these two. I’m going to be using these primarily for wildlife, which I don’t have much experience with, but I’ve heard so many different opinions about which lens is better. WebThe RP body would run me $899 on canon site refurbished or roughly $600 used on craigslist, etc. Lenses I'm considering for M50 as well as RP if I go that route.... RF. Rokinon 14mm f2.8 $250 NEW (B&H) Canon 50mm f1.8 $200 NEW (Canon) Canon 35mm f1.8 $400 REFURB (Canon) Canon 24-105mm f4 $880 REFURB (Canon) EF-M

EF VS RF LENSES : r/canon - reddit.com

WebThe RF 24-105 f4 is larger and heavier, but optically superior, aside from the constant f4 maximum aperture. It is weather sealed and has both a control and focus ring. The RF 24-105 f4-7.1 is small and light and forms a very small fullframe package combined with the RP. The tradeoffs of the f4-7.1 are: WebOld 'L' EF zoom lenses vs. new RF 'non-L' primes. I recently decided to get back into photography and bought a Canon RP body. It seemed like a great price point to test the waters with the hobby again; I also really liked the small form factor for a full frame sensor. I have two lenses from a past life: an EF 24-70m, 2.8 L and a EF 70-200mm 2.8L. shannon rae fabel waite park mn

RF vs EF lenses - Canon Europe

WebThese include a 24-105 f4 L, 35 f2, 50 f1.8 and 18-135 USM. I love using the 80D/35 f2 as a walk around setup. If I trade in all my crop sensor kit to mpb.com, I should receive … WebI currently own the EF 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS II, TS-E 24mm f/3.5L, TS-E 17mm f/4L, and RF 70-200mm f/4L. I'd say that they all seem to have fairly similar build quality and construction materials. I certainly haven't noticed any dramatic differences when out shooting. WebNov 23, 2024 · Specifically the 24-70mm ($600 more for RF), and the 70-200mm ($800 more). If you have existing EF lenses, I would run with those for now. I have three EF … shannon rae lindsey

r/canon - The upcoming new RF 14-35 f/4L IS USM and the RF 15 ... - reddit

RP vs New EF-M Lenses UPDATE : r/canon - reddit.com

WebReddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Go to canon r/canon • by Appropriate-Year-505. EF 70-200mm F/4 non IS vs EFs 55-250mm IS STM . How significant is the difference? A used 70-200 will be around 500€, the 55-250 can be had for as low as 200€. Are the differences really worth the 300 ... WebThe RP has the same sensor as the 6Dii, which according to DxOMark scores, has about 1.5 stops less DR than the SL2 at ISO 100. That difference decreases to both performing pretty much equally at ISO 400, and at higher ISOs the 6Dii sensor offers an extra stop of DR. So I think the notion that the SL2 "blows the EOS RP out of the water" is a ... pomerol williamsportWebHelp me decide: Fujifilm X-T5 vs Canon EOS R8. after neglecting my beloved hobby in the last few years/unpacking my cameras far too seldom, the fascination grabbed me again. After some market research, I came across camera models that caught my attention: the Fujifilm X-T5 and the EOS R8. I know that these are two very different cameras, and to ... shannon rae bolin mugshots

"WebWhether the lens is EF or EF-S makes NO difference here. Focal length is focal length and field of view is determined by focal length and the physical size of the sensor. All an EF-S lens tells you is that the lens doesn't have reasonable quality outside the cropped sensor of … " - Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Is RF glass that much better? : r/canon - reddit

Web4. FantasticGlass • 7 mo. ago. The L series RF glass handles CA and flaring better and is a bit sharper wide open. But compared to the most modern EF glass it's actually pretty close. The biggest difference I noticed was CA, the RF L glass has basically none. It's impressive. WebNo loss in image quality or autofocus performance, at all, when using a basic EF-to-EF-M or EF-to-RF adapter. All a basic adapter does is push the lens out to be the correct distance from the sensor in order to properly focus the light, and extend the electrical contacts out so that the body can communicate with the lens.

Did you know?

WebJan 11, 2016 · The RF 70-200/2.8 is my favourite major-change lens. To me, the size and weight difference over the EF is very real, and well-worth the telescoping action. Probably the RF70-200/4 is a huge improvement in usability too, but I've never shot with it. I like it even better than the RF100-500 vs the EF100-400. ••• WebRF 35mm 1.8 vs RF 16mm 2.8? Hey everyone I'm in a debate with myself about these two lens. So I currently have a Canon EOS R with 24-105mm F4 L USM. I want to get the 35mm F1.8 for night, street, Astro, full body portraits with blurry background. It's also on sale at the moment of $300 instead of $400. My dad the other day said he wants to get ...

WebAll three have Image Stabilization, including the Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM and Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM, where the corresponding EF lenses do not. "And the third lens in the trinity, the Canon RF 70 … WebIt's going to take a long time before Canon will be fully transitioned from EF to RF and because of that, Canon has announced a hand-full of EF-RF mount adapters for using …

WebThese include a 24-105 f4 L, 35 f2, 50 f1.8 and 18-135 USM. I love using the 80D/35 f2 as a walk around setup. If I trade in all my crop sensor kit to mpb.com, I should receive around £750, according to a recent quote. The cost of a second hand R6 is around £1,900 while an R7 is around £1,400 (both including ef-rf adaptor). WebIn the image quality comparison equalized at f/4, the two lenses are similar overall, with each having some advantages at specific focal lengths. The f/4 lens has stronger geometric distortion and has stronger lateral CA. The f/2.8 has stronger peripheral shading in most equalized comparisons.

WebReddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Mostly EF L lenses at the moment using the adapter. 24-70mm 2.8L II 70-200mm 2.8L II 16-35mm 2.8L III 85mm 1.4L 50mm 1.4 ... [New …

WebOptically, the RF50/1.2 and RF85/1.2 L's are worlds better than the EF variants. They are much faster in AF speed and their sharpness when shot wide-open is unreal. Whether that's worth it to you or not, that's up to you to decide, but for someone that values these aspects, it is very much worth it. 19 MintyMarlfox • 3 yr. ago shannon qvc shannon rae interiorsWebMost Canon EF lenses should work fine or better on the R6. Some exceptions do exist, impacting AF coverage and / or fps. With 3rd party lenses there is a higher risk of the same issues occurring, especially with older ones that can't be updated - some of them use lens ids that Canon used for lenses that don' t perform well on the R series. pomer orthopäde frankfurtWebWelcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome! pomeroy 4pc dining setWebNov 23, 2024 · For this purpose these lenses have been compared: Canon RF 50mm 1.2L. Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L. Canon EF 50mm 1.2L. … shannon quebec food deliveryWebHmm the specs on the 80d are decent other than crop sensor. I think the RP is a good step up - but only if it’s cos you don’t want to spend a few extra $ on the R. If you want a rugged body the canon rp is perhaps not the way to go. I played with one at the canon gallery in Osaka Japan last week. pomerol white wineWebEF 70-200mm f/4 vs RF 70-200mm f/4. I've been looking into getting a 70-200mm type lens for my EOS RP. If money was no object I'd probably go with the RF versions since it seems to have some slight advantages but I found some great deals that made me question whether the EF might be the way to go. The RF F/4 goes for around 1250 euros while I ... pomeroy 4piece dining set